Juraj's Blog

Borislav Pekic Atlantida.pdf

Final image: at dusk the island’s lamps are lit in mismatched colors; a violin plays a tune that is both national anthem and lullaby; a child runs along the quay holding a paper boat labeled “Atlantida” — not a grave marker, not a map, but an invitation.

If Pekić had written this Atlantida, he would have done it with tenderness for characters who are both ridiculous and dignified, with impatience for political theater, and with a sly belief that literature’s job is to make the reader complicit in the island’s survival. The city does not surrender its secrets; it trades them, in fragments and footnotes, for company.

Imagine a city whose map is written in contradictions: marble colonnades that dissolve into reeds, a senate that debates truth like a currency, and a library whose catalogues rearrange themselves according to who’s reading. The air tastes faintly of ozone and oranges. People arrive by different reasons — exile, research, love, debt — and stay for other reasons still: accident, obsession, or the slow pleasure of watching a civilization unmake itself. Borislav Pekic Atlantida.pdf

In the aftermath, M. folds his notebook and realizes his appetite for certainty has been tempered. He writes a short, crooked chronicle: not a definitive history, but a mosaic of voices, a ledger of small betrayals and braver reconciliations. He leaves with no more answers than he arrived with, but with a lighter luggage of certainties.

The narrator (let’s call him M.) is the kind of man Pekić loved — skeptical but sentimental, a professional survivor of vanished regimes. He reaches Atlantida by train and small boat, carrying a notebook full of marginalia and a single photograph he cannot bear to show anyone: a portrait of his own country folded into a map. He intends to write a history of the island. The island intends to complicate his grammar. Final image: at dusk the island’s lamps are

Two things animate the island’s story: memory and commerce. Pekić would have delighted in the economy of recollection — how people sell nostalgic souvenirs carved from fragments of real events, and how nostalgia can be monetized into whole industries. Market stalls peddle “authentic” artifacts: sea-glass trinkets labeled as evidence of a lost dynasty, certificates attesting to events that never happened. An enterprising historian opens an exhibit called “Truth by Subscription,” where patrons can pay to attend reenactments of personal histories they wish had occurred.

The climax arrives not as a melodramatic flood but as a moral tide: a courtroom trial held in an amphitheater to decide whether the island should formalize its myths into law. Witnesses arrive with different currencies of truth — blueprints, poems, buttoned-up statistics, a child’s crayon map. The verdict is less legal than theatrical: the island votes to keep its ambiguity. The judge, a retired fisherwoman, rules that Atlantida will be a living contradiction, protected precisely because it refuses a single story. Imagine a city whose map is written in

Pekić’s taste for paradox shows up in the political life of Atlantida: committees form to preserve the past and simultaneously to rewrite it. There is a Ministry of Maps that publishes atlases whose coastlines recede or advance depending on the current economic forecast. A festival is held annually to commemorate the island’s submergence — people dress in evening wear and dance in ankle-deep water as if rehearsing disappearance. When a delegation from the mainland arrives, demanding proof of sovereignty, a chorus of schoolchildren sings the island’s boundaries into being and the borders flicker, obedient to song.